Description: Features: shows current torrent-listing of your transmission-daemon, sorted by progress control-functions: Clear Finished Torrents* Add Torrent* Open WebUI* Open download directory* Pause active torrents Resume prev. active torrents start/stop daemon (items marked with * can be activated with buttons) optional: notification when torrent has finished downloading auto-run command on finished torrents
Depends: transmission (transmission-remote), tested with v 1.33 screenlets, tested with v 0.1.2 python-xlib (optional) pynotify (optional)
NB: the icon is part of the transmission-package, so not made by me.
some usage examples/ideas for the autorun feature 1) logging script: [quote]#!/bin/bash echo "`date`: $1" >> logfile[/quote] run with: /path/to/script %n
2) stopping or removing transmission-remote -t%t --stop or transmission-remote -t%t --remove 3) removing torrent based on ratio and moving files to another directory script: [quote]#!/bin/bash if [ $(echo "a=$(transmission-remote -t$1 --info | grep Ratio | sed -e 's/ Ratio: //');b=$5;r=0;if(a>=b)r=1;r"|bc) -eq 1 ] then transmission-remote -t$1 --remove mv $3/$2* $4 fi[/quote] run with: /path/to/script %t %n %d "/archive/directory" desired.Ratio uncheck "Run above command only once" (please set desired.Ratio to 1.0 or higher)
4) playing sound (e.g. with play) 5) mail notification
these scripts are mostly untested, use at own riskLast changelog:
v0.2beta3: output formatting minor bugfix
v0.2beta2: bugfix
v0.2beta: improvements, cleaner code, fixes python-xlib dependency only optional (it's used to automatically set screenlet-width to screen-width when first started, if python-xlib is not present, it's set to 800pixels) notification (if pynotify is present) new features: start/stop daemon, pause/resume torrents, autorun command -- please note that this is a beta release, so tell me about any bugs you find --
v0.1.1: bug-fix: listing of torrents didn't necessarily show all torrents added menuitems buttons can be hidden button size according to font
definitely not. "Adding" support for deluge would mean rewriting all/most of the code, so this would be a totally different screenlet. I do like the fact that Deluge is written in python, and using deluge instead of transmission would give me a lot of opportunities... but last time I tried deluge, it was way to buggy for me.
I doubt I will try deluge again anytime soon, so don't expect a screenlet for deluge from me.
Ratings & Comments
2 Comments
You will be may do support for deluge?
definitely not. "Adding" support for deluge would mean rewriting all/most of the code, so this would be a totally different screenlet. I do like the fact that Deluge is written in python, and using deluge instead of transmission would give me a lot of opportunities... but last time I tried deluge, it was way to buggy for me. I doubt I will try deluge again anytime soon, so don't expect a screenlet for deluge from me.