
Iraq Body Count Ticker
Source (link to git-repo or to original if based on someone elses unmodified work): Add the source-code for this project on opencode.net
hillmanj
16 years ago
Report
soulrebel
16 years ago
but still numbers are nothing really, who can even understand the extent of 'only' a hundred deaths - thats like all people you know or value just gone in the blink of a second... so dont compare numbers of the size. to decide whether the iraqis were better off before the us decided to 'expand there economical and political interests in the middle east' is not up to any of us; just to the iraqis. and - although i admit we didnt have to much coverage before the war - i cant help but think that they are not happier now. although saddams regime was brutal and repressive , the chance of being blown up while trying get food for your kids were not really high (this is not meant funny ). AND there were no terrorists roaming the land doing how they plaese, kidnapping, killing and robbing people.
just to point out: i DO reject religious extremism, terrorism, dictatorships and the like, but just keep in mind that although we value democracy above most things, it might not be the ultimate truth for everybody everywhere ->some people(s) maybe just aint ready for it!
ok nuff said...
Report
realcontrol2000
16 years ago
One more thing, when the US 'flexes' its military might it is in defense of you and this great nation. Thank god we have a leader that takes the defense of this nations seriously, and not like the last pres who simply allowed us to continue to be slaughtered.
ps. Although I disagree with the political point of the counter, it is nice coding....
Report
Nirbo
16 years ago
Some would argue that it's not up to the Iraqis for the sole reason that the US was able to occupy the country.
Personally, I think the UN should've bitch slapped the US the second they ignored their descision.
Hussien is (was) a small fish, but The Russian Federation, Germany, France, and The People's Republic of China... they've got more than enough soldiers to at least register on the US' radar if the US wants to continue throwing it's military weight around (Provided any actually come back out of Iraq).
Report
TheIconoclast
16 years ago
Report
catch223456789
16 years ago
Report
trickster
16 years ago
And does that include the Iraqis killed by their own terrorists?
Funny how everybody's a peace lover (are you really one?) these days, without knowing more than what the media is spoonfeeding them. Here's my suggestion: add to the ticker the number of Iraqis killed by their own Iraqi terrorists. And a ticker with number of days since more than 3000 kids lost their parents in New York is in order? Somebody ought to delete your crap.
Report
anonymous-hive
16 years ago
Report
TubaSoldier
16 years ago
Report
euxneks
16 years ago
Report
maitre
16 years ago
Report
Superstoned
16 years ago
Report
ja-el
16 years ago
IMO every death is worth to be counted, it's not like americans are better people or more worth by any means...
Report
theobroma
16 years ago
Report
anonymous-hive
16 years ago
Report
Superstoned
16 years ago
check:
amount killed iraqi civillians by americans and/or because of american attack on iraq:
20.000+
amount killed americans by iraqi's:
not much (war was short). at most I guess some 200...
amount killed by terrorist (eg 9/11): should we count that? its about the iraqi war, not about terrorists (eg Tsjetsjenie shouldnt be counted too...)
anyway if you insist, I guess some 3000?
Killed by saddam:
at least some 300.000 I guess, but a million might even be realistic.
so.
1.000.000 by Saddam. american' presense (not the american soldiers themselves, alot ppl in iraq are killed by terrorist attacks) costs a bit more than 20.000 lives. how is that compared? the attack of saddam did cost human lives. alot. but saddam was much worse. (think about toxic gass attacks on kurdian ppl - whole villages wiped out by Saddam's army).
if they didnt attack germany in World War II because they whould kill alot civilians that way, and let Hitler do whatever he wanted?
how whould the world be? harsh choices have to be made. I whould never say Bush did the right thing for the right reason, but I mostly question his motives.
Shoulnt we have attacked stalin, who has eliminated more than 20 MILLION russians in his rulership?
Report
moon115
16 years ago
My understanding from visiting the site
IraqBodyCount.org
Is that they are documenting civilian deaths. Since most of those civilians are Iraqi it would seem that a high importance is being placed on Iraqi life.
As for every death (life) being counted, I agree, they should be, but for a non-military audience civilian deaths lead to a more powerful sympathetic reaction.
I'll stop here before I get into my incendiary rhetoric.
Have a great night
Report
moon115
16 years ago
As for Saddams body count, well he had the support of Ronald Reagan, George Bush Sr and good buddy Donald Rumsfeld until they needed a new whipping boy.
Sorry to extend this into the realm of political discussion.
Report
catch223456789
16 years ago
Report
theobroma
16 years ago
Report